Nvidia geforce 930m 2 gb gddr3 running league of legends
![nvidia geforce 930m 2 gb gddr3 running league of legends nvidia geforce 930m 2 gb gddr3 running league of legends](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/NosPYasuWdc/maxresdefault.jpg)
- Nvidia geforce 930m 2 gb gddr3 running league of legends upgrade#
- Nvidia geforce 930m 2 gb gddr3 running league of legends pro#
I am also currently a mac user using a 2013 mac pro and 2015 MacBook pro to get my work done and for school. I am a web developer, currently learning machine learning and have also recently returned to school. I have a somewhat complex use case that has me unsure of what to do. I can’t guarantee these metrics and factors tell the whole story, but all available evidence points to my overclock being safe, functional, and massively improved performance. And while gaming at stock my temps are like 61.7c, and with my overclock I’m usually sitting pretty at about 55-57 depending on how long I’ve been gaming. Even Ryzen Master reports constant 1.4v + on stock, even while idling. It also runs cooler and uses less voltage than it does at stock. Another fairly big difference, and getting into 3700X and coffee lake Intel territory. Single core was 470 stock, 477 PBO, and 497 on the 4.3 ghz overclock. I have seen plenty of stock 3700X only getting about 4,500 or so, so my cpu is not even that far off that when overclocked. Cinebench R20 multicore was 3,377 stock, 3,450 with PBO, and 3,890 with my 4.3 ghz overclock. Then the actual proof is the fact that with stock and PBO my benchmarks were basically identical, but massively improved with the overclock. And that’s lower than the originally stated 1.325v safe voltage, but now that’s under scrutiny as safe. I can get all 6 cores to hit 4.3ghz quite steadily with my 1.3v OC, and they do all stay between 4.2-4.3 under load. For one my shit only boosts to like 3.7-4.090 ghz if Im lucky on stock or PBO, but usually only 3.3-3.7. Well I call bullshit on that for several reasons. Yeah I see big YouTubers claiming that a 3600 is better in single core using PBO than an overclock, and an overclock does basically nothing anyway. And I’m not really doing any content creation at the moment. And I would only be using it until the 4700X comes out, and I pick that or the 10700K. And the 3300X was just an idea to use as a stopgap in the interim if it did game better, because I could certainly sell my 3600 for about the cost of the 3300X. I just went with the 3600 because it was so cheap and good all around, but I’m starting to want to get max performance now that I can stretch my budget further.
![nvidia geforce 930m 2 gb gddr3 running league of legends nvidia geforce 930m 2 gb gddr3 running league of legends](https://i1.wp.com/laptopmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/geforce-930m-3qtr-940x272.jpg)
Becahse right now the difference can definitely be way bigger than 5-10 fps for 9700k or 10700K vs a 3700X or 3800X. Like if the difference really only is 5-10 fps in most games. Well, unless the 10700K is better on average but the difference is smaller than it was with coffee lake and Zen 2, then I’ll get the 4700X. I’ll go with whichever one games better at the time. I’m waiting for the 4700x/4900X to come out and compare it to the 10700K/10900K’s gaming performance. Also want to get more into content creation soon, after I graduate college in a few months, so I want 8-12 cores.
Nvidia geforce 930m 2 gb gddr3 running league of legends upgrade#
But if an Intel cpu can get better fps with a 2070s, I’m definitely wanting to upgrade to something better. Just kind of one of those things that doesn’t even really make complete sense. So it’s still technically bottlenecking it, even if it can get better performance with a better gpu. It’s hard to get an accurate picture of bottlenecks because while a 3600 will surely get an improvement from a 2080ti over a 2070s or 2080s, but then a 10600K may still get 15-30 more fps on average with the 2070s. The 3600 may bottleneck those at 1440p, not sure. I have a 2070s, plan on getting a 3070 or 3080 which will be way better.
![nvidia geforce 930m 2 gb gddr3 running league of legends nvidia geforce 930m 2 gb gddr3 running league of legends](https://www.notebookcheck.net/uploads/tx_nbc2/650M.jpg)
Overall, the Ryzen 7 3800XT is an average performer with its 8-cores and 16-threads in this benchmark. AMD's Ryzen 7 3800XT notches a small win over the Ryzen 7 2700X, but opens up an impressive lead over the stock Core i7-9700K. The Ryzen 7 3800XT yields minor improvements over the similarly-equipped 8-core Ryzen 7 2700X of 7.6%. The Ryzen 7 3800XT's performance earns it the 8th place. The Ryzen 7 2700X clearly shows how significantly the high-end Pinnacle Ridge-based CPUs fall behind the Zen 2 models. That's a ~7.6% generational speed-up in this title. Again, the Ryzen 7 2700X tumbles down the chart, falling behind its Zen 2-based successor. In this benchmark, the Ryzen 7 3800XT has an impressive performance, which is way ahead of the last generation Ryzen 7 2700X by 7.6%. The Ryzen 7 3800XT takes a comfortable 1.8% lead over the Core i7-9700K.
![nvidia geforce 930m 2 gb gddr3 running league of legends nvidia geforce 930m 2 gb gddr3 running league of legends](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/H2067V_DXUw/maxresdefault.jpg)
It is 0.6% lower than the Core i7-8700K while being 0.5% higher than the Ryzen 7 3800X. The Ryzen 7 3800XT sits between Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 7 3800X.